Barbaric Genius is a fascinating film to review in the light of the previous review on
this blog: Ballymun Lullaby. In Ballymun Lullaby the potential of
children to soak up the right kind of education is clear to see. You approach
the teaching of any subject from the right angle and children will devour it
hungrily. But this does not end at a fixed point in childhood. In Barbaric Genius, Paul Duane’s powerful
documentary, this is clearly also true of adults. For the subject (John Healy),
his shot at redemption is at the age of 30. The background to John Healy’s life
is the stuff of dreams for a documentarian. The son of Irish parents, Healy
started drinking at an early age. This led to a spell of about 11 years as a
vagrant, a subject which Healy has a lot to say about. It was this time too
that led to various stints in prison. While in prison his interest in chess is
piqued by the description of it as akin to stealing. It is this, the most basic
of life lessons that changes everything.
But Healy was, and indeed is, no
working class cliché. Taught to play chess by a fellow inmate, Healy was not
satisfied just to play. Almost becoming a grandmaster, he played in, and won,
many tournaments. The drive to become a grandmaster brought him stresses that
made him give up chess but also help forge the compulsion to write. His need to
put his remarkable energy into something resulted in his memoir, The Grass Arena, (the story of his
difficult life). It was an instant sensation and brought with it fame and
recognition. But it is the subsequent withdrawal of the book from print which
is the main jumping off point for Duane’s film.
Healy is a reluctant interviewee.
But it is clear that he has an interesting story to tell. Almost monosyllabic
in a formal interview he becomes a warmer and more eloquent presence when he
walks the streets that he lived on. In a lot of the shots, it is what he
doesn’t say that captures the harshness of a previous life. It is in the
close-ups of his hands that betray a life hard life lived: knotted, constantly
moving, seemingly on high alert. It is in the distant stare of his eyes as he
remembers people who he used to know, some now dead. Duane knows when to hold
the camera on his subject, to let the viewer see the effects of Healy’s life on
him now. This is subtle filmmaking and other documentarians should take note.
The story of his fall out with his
book’s publishers is a fascinating one. Duane uses a classic filmmaker’s device
of briefly mentioning it early in the film but not returning to it until later.
This drawing out of the story works as there is so much more than that going on,
but it is a risky and bold move. Duane uses interviews with various people at
the publishing house to try and get at the truth of the falling out. Healy
believes that it had to do with class and there is circumstantial evidence to
support this theory. The truth is never quite clear but it is a fascinating
story that won’t be given away here. Suffice to say that a misunderstanding and
a clash of cultures is as good an explanation as there probably is. It would
have been interesting to see Duane probe and question Healy a little more, but
one imagines Healy says only what he wants to say regardless of the question.
Barbaric Genius is an apt title for this film. There is a sense from Healy that should
he turn his mind to practically anything, his drive and dedication would see
him try to perfect it. To see The Grass
Arena back in print in the Penguin
Classics series is a vindication of his life’s work. But this is not the
clear triumph to send an audience home happy as it may appear initially. Healy
still has financial worries to contend with. One also imagines looking at his
eyes in close-up that there may well be some demons left to fight. Duane’s
documentary does what all very good documentaries do: namely to give the audience
the urge to learn more about the subject. In this case I will endeavour to read
all of John Healy’s literary work. There is no finer recommendation for a film
than that.